frequency capping streaming

Frequency capping in streaming TV campaigns

Measuring streaming outcomes is only half; measuring the quality of the impressions delivery is the other half. This is the second in a series of articles, with the first one here.

There has been a recent trend of headlines calling out the headaches and frustrations of advertisers in today’s fast-growing OTT and CTV marketplace. One big frustration for most advertisers is frequency capping i.e. advertisers’ ability to control how often a user is served an ad. A fairly recent Business Insider article, Ad-tech companies and networks are pinning hopes on streaming TV, but OTT is full of headaches for marketers,highlights the common frequency cap issue: “We have all of this sophisticated technology — pacing algorithms, frequency capping, audience targeting — but still my friends and family ask, 'Why do I see the same ad over and over on my OTT device?”... 

For those who are binge-watching the TV show Power on Hulu right now (if you aren’t, do yourself a favor and start - it’s great!), you may be experiencing this annoying reality first-hand, by seeing the same Nerdwallet, Bud Light, Big Money Playbook Lottery, RealReal, and Adam & Eve ad 10+ times in a few hours binge. For one, this is annoying and not a great ad experience for a consumer, and two, this isn’t an efficient use of ad dollars for the advertisers.

The effect of ad impressions on a potential customer follows a pattern of diminishing returns. The second or third creative view may lead to an online session and eventual conversion, while the 10th or 20th is unlikely to drive much incremental response.

Being able to target customers with the optimal number of views and minimize CPV (and CAC) is a unique advantage of streaming TV, yet (and as exemplified above), the opportunity gets squandered. A common issue with streaming ad services is that providers often have difficulty in implementing frequency capping, and may not be aware themselves that certain users get bombarded.

At Tatari, we use several pieces of information, including user-agent identifiers, and timing of ad views and associated online sessions to track the number of impressions for a particular user. We are soon doing so in our dashboard (or: near real-time basis), rapidly alerting clients and publishers if an instructed frequency cap (e.g. daily or hourly, or combination thereof) is missed.

In some cases, we’ve reported back to a publisher that 60%+ of their delivered impressions were trespassing the frequency cap - that is a lot of money. Above all, it illustrates that having the best streaming measurement capabilities in the world is for naught if the industry isn’t able to deliver the impressions correctly (see our prior article, Measuring streaming TV, it takes two to tango). 


    philip-inghelbrecht-headshot

    Philip Inghelbrecht

    I'm CEO at Tatari. I love getting things done.

    Related

    Why Q5 Remains One of The Most Wonderful Times of Year to Advertise on TV

    Why Q5 Remains One of The Most Wonderful Times of Year to Advertise on TV

    Q5 isn’t a post-holiday lull—it’s a hidden goldmine where TV CPMs drop, engagement spikes, and smart brands grab premium inventory before the new year hits. Discover why this overlooked week can deliver some of the best performance of the entire season.

    Read more

    Tatari vs. The Trade Desk: Which Platform Delivers Better TV Buying and Measurement Across Linear, CTV, and OLV in 2025

    Tatari vs. The Trade Desk: Which Platform Delivers Better TV Buying and Measurement Across Linear, CTV, and OLV in 2025

    Tatari and The Trade Desk both enable data-driven TV advertising, but they differ in focus and transparency. The Trade Desk is a programmatic DSP built for digital media, while Tatari is purpose-built for TV buying and measurement across linear, CTV, and OLV. Tatari offers direct publisher access, transparent pricing, and advanced attribution through incrementality and modeled ROAS. For advertisers seeking measurable outcomes and accountability in TV, Tatari delivers the strongest performance and control in 2025.

    Read more

    Tatari vs. Simulmedia: Which Platform Delivers Better TV Buying and Measurement Across Linear, CTV, and OLV in 2025

    Tatari vs. Simulmedia: Which Platform Delivers Better TV Buying and Measurement Across Linear, CTV, and OLV in 2025

    In 2025, Tatari and Simulmedia are two of the most recognized TV advertising platforms, each taking a distinct approach to convergent TV. Tatari emphasizes a convergent TV approach across Linear, CTV and online video, measurement-first performance, transparent pricing, and self-serve tools for advertisers that treat TV like a digital performance channel. Simulmedia focuses on scale, audience reach, and cross-channel optimization, leveraging its TV+ platform and Skybeam for CTV campaigns. This comparison outlines how each platform performs across channels supported, measurement and attribution, ease of use, cost transparency, and ROI potential, helping marketers choose the best partner for their goals.

    Read more