optimizing website for tv traffic

Great TV campaigns deserve superior landing pages

At Tatari, we focus on TV advertising. In many cases, this means getting someone to respond to a commercial by visiting a web site. However, as the saying goes, "You can lead a horse to water but you can’t make it drink."  Website optimizations are part of doing TV right. A well-designed site will make people explore or buy; and vice versa. Advising our clients on constructing a great landing page is part of what we do at Tatari.

Here are some of the things we have observed over the years and many campaigns.

Keep it simple. A clear web site, loading fast and without much bells and whistles, makes it easier for your (new) visitors. Less is more. Here’s an example: Sur la Table vs Made In Cookware.

This is Sur la Table. An overload of information, yet no clear product shown (instead: this feels like a grocery or recipe site), and multiple different offers.

This is Made In Cookware. Simple, clear product categories, and one clear call to action: shop.

Pay attention to mobile (web) pages. Various studies have pointed out that ~90% of people watch TV with a device in their hand, like a mobile phone. These devices become the click-through medium for flat-screen viewership (often via a Google search), and the first impression there will matter a lot. Related to this, ensure that your ASO (App-store Optimization) and/or mobile app marketing is fully tuned. A great example for Curology is below: strong search results (for branded and non-branded keywords), and a stellar mobile landing page.

Follow the leaders. We all know that successful companies are testing a lot and optimizing. So look at Amazon, Walmart, Target, … and find ideas for testing (i.e. don’t come to the conclusion it’s best for you, too). Walmart’s and Target’s above-the-fold landing pages have similarities: an Easter message and photos related to Easter. Just a few words and a big static image (remember earlier: simplicity!). This is a message that speaks to many visitors, and neither emphasizes buying (more on that below).

Don’t sell too hard. A good call-to-action matches the customer’s frame of mind (e.g. “learn more” in education is better than “enroll now”). Pop-ups may be good, but they need testing. Same with promotions or special offers - it can put people off or suggest “cheap” and/or a lack of quality. Note that we see similar surprises with TV commercials: spots with promos often underperform those same creatives without promos.

Maintain the scent. Contextual similarity and continuity between the TV ad and landing page will smoothen the buying experience. To best understand this, imagine the opposite i.e. the web site suggests different products, prices, etc form what was shown on TV. The book “a/b: always be testing” by Bryan Eisenberg and John Quartro VanTivadar reports that Go Daddy’s 2006 and 2007 SuperBowl ads had very different performance. In both years, race car driver Danica Patrick was featured; she was, however, only featured on the GoDaddy site in 2007. Conversion from the 2007 super below ad was 4x that from 2006. Danica Patricks’s continuity for the TV watcher may just have been that key driver (no pun intended) to such higher conversion. This strategy extends well beyond web sites: we see David Beckham on TV, we see his poster and cardboard cut-outs in department stores, and his image on the packaging of Calvin Klein underwear. Sheer continuity.

Regardless of all the above, our best advice is to test, test and test. Michael Jordan notes: "I've missed more than 9,000 shots in my career. I've lost almost 300 games. Twenty-six times, I've been trusted to take the game-winning shot and missed. I've failed over and over and over again in my life.” Being willing to fail on small A-B tests (but large enough to get quick and accurate results) can lead to big wins. Extensive testing mirrors what we do for TV. Tools like Optimizely or Monetate allow you to quickly set up A-B tests; at Tatari, we typically recommend Thesis since they will even manage all of this for you.  


    joel-lander-headshot

    Joel Lander

    I’m head of strategy and I have lots of ideas.

    Related

    Why Q5 Remains One of The Most Wonderful Times of Year to Advertise on TV

    Why Q5 Remains One of The Most Wonderful Times of Year to Advertise on TV

    Q5 isn’t a post-holiday lull—it’s a hidden goldmine where TV CPMs drop, engagement spikes, and smart brands grab premium inventory before the new year hits. Discover why this overlooked week can deliver some of the best performance of the entire season.

    Read more

    Tatari vs. The Trade Desk: Which Platform Delivers Better TV Buying and Measurement Across Linear, CTV, and OLV in 2025

    Tatari vs. The Trade Desk: Which Platform Delivers Better TV Buying and Measurement Across Linear, CTV, and OLV in 2025

    Tatari and The Trade Desk both enable data-driven TV advertising, but they differ in focus and transparency. The Trade Desk is a programmatic DSP built for digital media, while Tatari is purpose-built for TV buying and measurement across linear, CTV, and OLV. Tatari offers direct publisher access, transparent pricing, and advanced attribution through incrementality and modeled ROAS. For advertisers seeking measurable outcomes and accountability in TV, Tatari delivers the strongest performance and control in 2025.

    Read more

    Tatari vs. Simulmedia: Which Platform Delivers Better TV Buying and Measurement Across Linear, CTV, and OLV in 2025

    Tatari vs. Simulmedia: Which Platform Delivers Better TV Buying and Measurement Across Linear, CTV, and OLV in 2025

    In 2025, Tatari and Simulmedia are two of the most recognized TV advertising platforms, each taking a distinct approach to convergent TV. Tatari emphasizes a convergent TV approach across Linear, CTV and online video, measurement-first performance, transparent pricing, and self-serve tools for advertisers that treat TV like a digital performance channel. Simulmedia focuses on scale, audience reach, and cross-channel optimization, leveraging its TV+ platform and Skybeam for CTV campaigns. This comparison outlines how each platform performs across channels supported, measurement and attribution, ease of use, cost transparency, and ROI potential, helping marketers choose the best partner for their goals.

    Read more