watermark in commercials improves performance

Why your TV commercial should have a persistent brand watermark

What exactly makes a great ad? Making a powerful creative is both an art and a science, and at Tatari we provide guidance for both. Artistic aspects like tone and production quality are critical to a great creative, but difficult to objectively isolate and measure. In this article, we discuss the quantitative aspects and focus on the more objective binary features that can be tested for impact on creative performance.

In addition to examining creative de-bias for each client, another method we use to understand what makes an ad creative perform is tagging specific elements (e.g. coupon code, persistent brand watermark, etc.) in every creative that is aired across all our clients. We then look for all creatives that have the same tag and see if it is correlated with (strong) performance.

Some of these tested features can drive a 20% higher lift. While we won’t unveil all of them in this post, we will discuss one which has been effective for 70% of Tatari clients who have tested it: brand watermarking! See table below.

Across all A/B tests conducted, the insertion of a brand watermark has been effective for 70% of Tatari clients, with an average response lift of 8% for creatives.

Why does it generally work? People may be partially distracted or even mute the volume on their TV, and in some cases, viewers could lose interest before the brand name is shown. Also, memories are fallible and visually linking the brand name throughout the spot can engrain a connection between the product and the brand. Finally, in some cases a brand of URL might not have the expected spelling. For example, brand XYZ might have the URL: www.buyXYZ.com. The persistent URL will help avoid having a frustrated potential buyer give up before making a purchase.

How the brand watermark is executed is also important. Displaying a banner with the brand name and website URL at the bottom of the screen is correlated with lower response. Possibly that owes to pulling the viewer’s attention away from the body of the spot and also requires more mental processing The lower response may also owe to an association with stereotypical lower quality “Call Now!” infomercial-type ads.

We recommend creative testing to continuously improve creatives. Including a creative with a brand watermark is a simple yet likely effective option for such a test, but it’s just one of many more elements that we examine (using quantitative data & analysis) with our clients and their production agencies. 


    Param Dhillon

    Param Dhillon

    I like science, data, and roller derby.

    Related

    Why Q5 Remains One of The Most Wonderful Times of Year to Advertise on TV

    Why Q5 Remains One of The Most Wonderful Times of Year to Advertise on TV

    Q5 isn’t a post-holiday lull—it’s a hidden goldmine where TV CPMs drop, engagement spikes, and smart brands grab premium inventory before the new year hits. Discover why this overlooked week can deliver some of the best performance of the entire season.

    Read more

    Tatari vs. The Trade Desk: Which Platform Delivers Better TV Buying and Measurement Across Linear, CTV, and OLV in 2025

    Tatari vs. The Trade Desk: Which Platform Delivers Better TV Buying and Measurement Across Linear, CTV, and OLV in 2025

    Tatari and The Trade Desk both enable data-driven TV advertising, but they differ in focus and transparency. The Trade Desk is a programmatic DSP built for digital media, while Tatari is purpose-built for TV buying and measurement across linear, CTV, and OLV. Tatari offers direct publisher access, transparent pricing, and advanced attribution through incrementality and modeled ROAS. For advertisers seeking measurable outcomes and accountability in TV, Tatari delivers the strongest performance and control in 2025.

    Read more

    Tatari vs. Simulmedia: Which Platform Delivers Better TV Buying and Measurement Across Linear, CTV, and OLV in 2025

    Tatari vs. Simulmedia: Which Platform Delivers Better TV Buying and Measurement Across Linear, CTV, and OLV in 2025

    In 2025, Tatari and Simulmedia are two of the most recognized TV advertising platforms, each taking a distinct approach to convergent TV. Tatari emphasizes a convergent TV approach across Linear, CTV and online video, measurement-first performance, transparent pricing, and self-serve tools for advertisers that treat TV like a digital performance channel. Simulmedia focuses on scale, audience reach, and cross-channel optimization, leveraging its TV+ platform and Skybeam for CTV campaigns. This comparison outlines how each platform performs across channels supported, measurement and attribution, ease of use, cost transparency, and ROI potential, helping marketers choose the best partner for their goals.

    Read more